92% af verdens olieselskaber belønner ledelserne for at skabe større CO2-emissioner! (rapport fra Carbon Tracker, februar 2019)

Most oil and gas companies incentivise their management to pursue growth, rather than focus solely on shareholder returns.

Climate is rarely taken into account!

  • (Report from Carbon Tracker, February 2019)

Key findings from the report:

  • In 2017, 92% of oil and gas companies in our universe included measures that directly incentivise growth in fossil fuel development, relating to either production, reserves, or both.
  • Companies with the highest weightings on production and reserves/resources growth include Anadarko, Cabot Oil & Gas, CNRL and Oil Search.
  • Only three companies (Galp Energia, Diamondback Energy and Origin Energy) did not include production/ reserves in their incentive structures in 2017; BP and Equinor joined them in 2018. However, 4 of these 5 companies have other metrics that indirectly reward growth, but in a less obvious manner.
  • We highlight Diamondback Energy as the only company to have no growth metrics in its incentive structure for 2018, with its executives incentivised entirely on returns and cost metrics. Equinor is next closest, with only a minor inclusion of cash flow from operations.
  • Shareholder pressure to focus on value has had an effect – 10 companies (26% of those giving full disclosure) introduced or increased emphasis on returns measures in 2018 over 2017. For example, BP removed a reserves
    replacement metric from its long term incentive plan and introduced return on capital employed.
  • In the 2 years following the 2014 oil market crash, US E&P companies with a lower proportion of reserves or production incentive in their annual bonuses outperformed more growth-oriented companies by 7% CAGR (although the gap has subsequently closed). Shareholder returns exhibited a negative correlation with production and reserves-related annual bonus metrics, but a positive correlation with financial returns metrics.
  • 9 companies have performance metrics that relate in some way to mitigating climate change. This includes half of the European companies reviewed, such as Equinor and Shell, but only one US company out of 20 (ExxonMobil, relating to its algae, CCS and methane reduction initiatives). However, where they are included, these metrics tend to affect a small minority of compensation, and most of these companies simultaneously encourage fossil fuel growth.

 

Læs mere her eller brug dette link til Carbon Tracker.

Sources: All texts, content, quotes and graphics by Carbon Tracker. All credits and rights to Carbon Tracker.

Posted in CO2.